Search the number in quotes together with the topic. Confident round numbers
that circulate widely — 90%, 70%, 10,000 hours — usually trace back to one
source, and the trail is often short.
Pay close attention to the period. Failure rates over one year, five years and
ten years are wildly different numbers, and the timeframe is the detail most
often dropped when a statistic is shared.
A strong submission reaches an actual publisher — a statistics agency, a
research body, or an academic paper — and quotes what it really said.
The most common finding on this kind of claim is that the timeframe changed.
Business survival statistics are typically published over multi-year windows,
so a figure describing failure over five or ten years frequently gets
retold as "in the first year".
Also strong: noticing that "startups" and "new businesses" are not the same
population, and that official survival statistics usually cover all new
employer businesses, not venture-backed startups.
"Could not verify" is a completely acceptable verdict if you searched properly
and no original exists. Many circulating statistics have no traceable source at
all, and establishing that is a real result — it is the difference between
"this is false" and "nobody knows where this came from".
Would you have questioned this claim if you had seen it in the chat rather than
in a lab? Most people would not. That is the honest reason this skill needs
practice rather than agreement.
Your attempt
Constraints
·You must reach the original publisher, not an article about it